It appears that this dog’s “quality of life” is most likely getting better after each treatment, as well. The healing process looks to be less problematic, compared to what other ablation methods encounter post treatment. I wonder if “wound healing time” is reduced, when ClO2 intratumoral ablation is the treatment path? The same “quality of life” benefit might also be true for a human, as well as everything else you report as being significant. Thanks for sharing this important information.
Yes, I think the same general pattern should apply to humans as well. Dogs and humans are different species, but when it comes to local tumor destruction, tissue necrosis, wound recovery, bleeding, swelling and pain, the basic biological direction should be similar.
What we are seeing in these animals is not only tumor shrinkage, but also a relatively manageable recovery process after treatment. That may be very important for quality of life.
If the same advantages are seen in humans, then the value of intratumoral ClO₂ ablation may not only be how quickly it destroys the tumor, but also how the patient feels and recovers afterward.
Thank you for noticing this point. I think it may become one of the important advantages of this approach.
Xuewu Liu,
It appears that this dog’s “quality of life” is most likely getting better after each treatment, as well. The healing process looks to be less problematic, compared to what other ablation methods encounter post treatment. I wonder if “wound healing time” is reduced, when ClO2 intratumoral ablation is the treatment path? The same “quality of life” benefit might also be true for a human, as well as everything else you report as being significant. Thanks for sharing this important information.
JL
可以，评论区就应该自然一点，直接回应，不要搞成论文。你可以这样回：
Yes, I think the same general pattern should apply to humans as well. Dogs and humans are different species, but when it comes to local tumor destruction, tissue necrosis, wound recovery, bleeding, swelling and pain, the basic biological direction should be similar.
What we are seeing in these animals is not only tumor shrinkage, but also a relatively manageable recovery process after treatment. That may be very important for quality of life.
If the same advantages are seen in humans, then the value of intratumoral ClO₂ ablation may not only be how quickly it destroys the tumor, but also how the patient feels and recovers afterward.
Thank you for noticing this point. I think it may become one of the important advantages of this approach.