Thank you for this thoughtful breakdown of BCI-tech through the lense of your PPI-approach! What do you think would the Integration of the dielectric nature of the entirety of Organic life add to your Argumentation? Since WWII Russia and Germany know, that electromagnetic fields interaktiv with the cells exposed. And Since Herman Schwan, a paperclip-scientist who in the 1970s became one of the founders of Biophysics, the world knows from him, how important exposure limits really are. Ignoring Natural laws is Part of the problem you are describing!
Thanks, Karsten. I agree: treating organic life as a dielectric system strengthens the argument.
In practice, it means the reliable way to assess BCI is at the predictable, system-level layer—where effects are measurable, repeatable, and bounded by exposure limits—rather than assuming fine-grained cellular interactions will be controllable. Ignoring these physical constraints is exactly how engineering claims become unreliable.
Thank you for this thoughtful breakdown of BCI-tech through the lense of your PPI-approach! What do you think would the Integration of the dielectric nature of the entirety of Organic life add to your Argumentation? Since WWII Russia and Germany know, that electromagnetic fields interaktiv with the cells exposed. And Since Herman Schwan, a paperclip-scientist who in the 1970s became one of the founders of Biophysics, the world knows from him, how important exposure limits really are. Ignoring Natural laws is Part of the problem you are describing!
Thanks, Karsten. I agree: treating organic life as a dielectric system strengthens the argument.
In practice, it means the reliable way to assess BCI is at the predictable, system-level layer—where effects are measurable, repeatable, and bounded by exposure limits—rather than assuming fine-grained cellular interactions will be controllable. Ignoring these physical constraints is exactly how engineering claims become unreliable.