My first question today is always "was it contaminated ivermectin they used?", as the majority is.
Secondly it should be combined with mebendazole or fenbendazole as plenty of research has been done on that. Look up Joe Tippens or mycancerstoryrocks .
As usual the patients chosen have already been poisoned with radiation and chemo prior or am I mistaken.
For me today I am doing the fenben, ivm and cds as a prophylactic and will do so on a bi annual basis. If I had a solid tumor I would self inject using your methods rather than take any allopathic route.
You are doing great work and it is appreciated. What you have written here is the normal situation for today.
Sticking to the science and 1000’s of antecdotal stories which equal a study. Sharing same cancer types , same (generally)modalities that dosage of ivermectin was woefully inadequate. I’m a big fan of CDS but I have documentation of my Signatera labs and ivermectin has been a big part of my protocol.
Yah, Now that I went through the papers, I agree with RCON. Doses were woefully inadequate for cancer. People who respond tend to take 4-10x more. Just as it was with ivermectin for covid trials. Ivermectin is a part of my protocol but I take primarily IV drips whenever my CSC go up on MAintrack liquid biopsy test.
Looks like a blind combination. Well, it has not worked great and we should leave it at that. There is no way of knowing if individually those drugs would have worked better. Ivermectin in combination with other repurposed drugs has been seen in many many successful anectodes, particularly Fenbendazole. Many of these repurposed drugs would also carry some immune modulating activity and they could be enough, instead of an only new immune drug, which is still under real time evaluation. Please build up on the many many successful anecdotes we have, particularly those that have used combination prescriptions. That should be the first priority for the work on repurposed drugs.
As a long retired organic chemist (PhD), with reading interest in the chemical structures of many drugs in use. Back in 2021 in Covid times I had kind of surmised that based on certain shared chemical structure features, as many as 1500 known drugs in current use from different indications, small and big, could be antiviral against this virus. How 1500 ? Here is the approximation. Of the approximately 2500 molecules that have been in use in decades, some 80% contrain Nitrogen in their chemical structure. If out of these 80% contain a specific of Nitrogen setting, an amine type or of basic nature, they have the feature against RNA viruses, especially their pathogenic cationic spike proteins. That makes it about 1500, plus minus 100. This is not actually a new surmise, except for the large number. This particular structure feature has been known among researchers as Cationic Amphiphilic Drugs ( CADs) and few of them across many indications were considered for anti viral activity. In early 2021, a few researchers did invoke this concept of CAD and respiratory drugs like Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine, Doxycycline, particularly many anti histamines were shown by them in hospital settings to mitigate Covid conditions, even saving lives. In much of the rest of the world, other than the West including the USA, these molecules became the Covid slayers starting in late 2021 and 2022. Incidentally, in 2021, a paper on computer screening for anti viral activity among the existing drugs mentioned about 1600 drugs being possibly anti viral. Thus the irony. An entire pharmacy stock could theoretically fight Covid, yet the world struggle for nearly the first 18 months without treating the disease and anxiously waiting for new anti virals like Paxlovid.
Now, many of the 20-30 odd repurposed drugs showing promise in cancer, might have a shared chemical structure feature. That could be related to their acidity constants, pKa. The lead molecule here, Ivermectin, though is structurally different. I would stick my neck out and propose that many of them could have off label and part strength immune modulating activity. When a recommended protocol contains 3-4 of them, as I have seen often is the case, there could be sufficient immune modulating activity against cancer too. In other words, most of these drugs could provide a strong mechanism against cancer. Ivermectin provides the same by different mechanisms. Not a single drug, but only in combinations that have to be clinically judged well by the doctor, one could enough of the needed activity. Learn from the Covid experience.
Dr Justus Hope has given a very good summary of the use of Ivermectin in cancer treatment in his Substack report. He clearly mentions that Ivermectin + PD1 works very well, with Ivermectin augmenting the effect of immunotherapy. Please go through the same and offer your comments.
"Is my credibility supposed to depend on worshiping a drug with limited clinical effect?"
No one is "worshiping" anything. To be clear, *YES* I *do* have family members who have been afflicted with this dreaded disease. Why the anger when someone questions YOUR worshiping of chlorine dioxide treatment - specifically the injection technique that YOU are trying to promote and capitalize on?
Seriously.
"So I speak out because I care about what actually works—not about pleasing you or any doctor who dislikes me. . ."
I am not out to garner favors or approvals from anyone. I could *not* care less about anyone "pleasing" me. I am searching for information that will help those I love, because there ARE many methods of treating this horrible disease. If you bothered to look deeper into this - instead of just your solitary injection treatment - you might come away with additional data that would help you and others. No pleasing anyone required.
Whoa, that's enough to give me pause right there. Additionally:
"A Phase I/II study (NCT05318469), conducted by researchers at Cedars-Sinai and City of Hope, tested a combination of:
Oral ivermectin (30–60 mg)
Balstilimab, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor developed by Agenus . . . "
What would you expect from institutions heavily funded and controlled by Big Pharma? Of course, they are going to do all they can to discredit alternative methods of treatment that threaten their bottom line.
And you, Xuewu Liu, adding to the "ivermectin-bashing" seriously calls into question YOUR credibility. Tearing down ivermectin in order to promote YOUR chlorine dioxide therapy? Pretty easy to see your incentive to post this. I've read many exchanges you've had with Robert Yoho MD - he's not very fond of you or your work, either.
Why shouldn’t I be allowed to question ivermectin? Is my credibility supposed to depend on worshiping a drug with limited clinical effect?
Are you a cancer patient—or the family of one?
Because if you’re not, you probably don’t realize what it’s like to watch someone dying while holding onto false hope.
Defending the ivermectin myth as if it’s untouchable doesn’t help patients. It hurts them. It wastes their time. I’ve seen people delay real treatment and die waiting for it to work.
I’ve also seen tumors collapse in days from direct chlorine dioxide injection. So I speak out because I care about what actually works—not about pleasing you or any doctor who dislikes me.
My job is not to please you—or Dr. Yoho—or to follow the crowd.
My work stands on its own evidence, its own mechanism, and its own clinical cases.
If that offends you, maybe ask yourself:
What do you care more about—ideology or saving lives?
Because I’ve made my choice.
And as for the clinical trial—
Are you saying you don’t like the result, or you simply don’t believe it?
My first question today is always "was it contaminated ivermectin they used?", as the majority is.
Secondly it should be combined with mebendazole or fenbendazole as plenty of research has been done on that. Look up Joe Tippens or mycancerstoryrocks .
As usual the patients chosen have already been poisoned with radiation and chemo prior or am I mistaken.
For me today I am doing the fenben, ivm and cds as a prophylactic and will do so on a bi annual basis. If I had a solid tumor I would self inject using your methods rather than take any allopathic route.
You are doing great work and it is appreciated. What you have written here is the normal situation for today.
Thanks and Regards,
Matt.
Matt J. o. A. B. Would you share your prophylactic protocol? How many mg per lb or kg and how frequently. Thabk you
Joe Tippen's has the best researched protocols. I am not a Dr and can only say what I would personally do.
Self inject? Gutsy. Mine is in my spine. That would be uber painful. Wish it weren’t halfway around the world and $20,000.
Sticking to the science and 1000’s of antecdotal stories which equal a study. Sharing same cancer types , same (generally)modalities that dosage of ivermectin was woefully inadequate. I’m a big fan of CDS but I have documentation of my Signatera labs and ivermectin has been a big part of my protocol.
Folk medicine?
Yah, Now that I went through the papers, I agree with RCON. Doses were woefully inadequate for cancer. People who respond tend to take 4-10x more. Just as it was with ivermectin for covid trials. Ivermectin is a part of my protocol but I take primarily IV drips whenever my CSC go up on MAintrack liquid biopsy test.
Looks like a blind combination. Well, it has not worked great and we should leave it at that. There is no way of knowing if individually those drugs would have worked better. Ivermectin in combination with other repurposed drugs has been seen in many many successful anectodes, particularly Fenbendazole. Many of these repurposed drugs would also carry some immune modulating activity and they could be enough, instead of an only new immune drug, which is still under real time evaluation. Please build up on the many many successful anecdotes we have, particularly those that have used combination prescriptions. That should be the first priority for the work on repurposed drugs.
As a long retired organic chemist (PhD), with reading interest in the chemical structures of many drugs in use. Back in 2021 in Covid times I had kind of surmised that based on certain shared chemical structure features, as many as 1500 known drugs in current use from different indications, small and big, could be antiviral against this virus. How 1500 ? Here is the approximation. Of the approximately 2500 molecules that have been in use in decades, some 80% contrain Nitrogen in their chemical structure. If out of these 80% contain a specific of Nitrogen setting, an amine type or of basic nature, they have the feature against RNA viruses, especially their pathogenic cationic spike proteins. That makes it about 1500, plus minus 100. This is not actually a new surmise, except for the large number. This particular structure feature has been known among researchers as Cationic Amphiphilic Drugs ( CADs) and few of them across many indications were considered for anti viral activity. In early 2021, a few researchers did invoke this concept of CAD and respiratory drugs like Azithromycin, Montelukast, Levocetrizine, Doxycycline, particularly many anti histamines were shown by them in hospital settings to mitigate Covid conditions, even saving lives. In much of the rest of the world, other than the West including the USA, these molecules became the Covid slayers starting in late 2021 and 2022. Incidentally, in 2021, a paper on computer screening for anti viral activity among the existing drugs mentioned about 1600 drugs being possibly anti viral. Thus the irony. An entire pharmacy stock could theoretically fight Covid, yet the world struggle for nearly the first 18 months without treating the disease and anxiously waiting for new anti virals like Paxlovid.
Now, many of the 20-30 odd repurposed drugs showing promise in cancer, might have a shared chemical structure feature. That could be related to their acidity constants, pKa. The lead molecule here, Ivermectin, though is structurally different. I would stick my neck out and propose that many of them could have off label and part strength immune modulating activity. When a recommended protocol contains 3-4 of them, as I have seen often is the case, there could be sufficient immune modulating activity against cancer too. In other words, most of these drugs could provide a strong mechanism against cancer. Ivermectin provides the same by different mechanisms. Not a single drug, but only in combinations that have to be clinically judged well by the doctor, one could enough of the needed activity. Learn from the Covid experience.
Dr Justus Hope has given a very good summary of the use of Ivermectin in cancer treatment in his Substack report. He clearly mentions that Ivermectin + PD1 works very well, with Ivermectin augmenting the effect of immunotherapy. Please go through the same and offer your comments.
"Is my credibility supposed to depend on worshiping a drug with limited clinical effect?"
No one is "worshiping" anything. To be clear, *YES* I *do* have family members who have been afflicted with this dreaded disease. Why the anger when someone questions YOUR worshiping of chlorine dioxide treatment - specifically the injection technique that YOU are trying to promote and capitalize on?
Seriously.
"So I speak out because I care about what actually works—not about pleasing you or any doctor who dislikes me. . ."
I am not out to garner favors or approvals from anyone. I could *not* care less about anyone "pleasing" me. I am searching for information that will help those I love, because there ARE many methods of treating this horrible disease. If you bothered to look deeper into this - instead of just your solitary injection treatment - you might come away with additional data that would help you and others. No pleasing anyone required.
Maybe YOU should stop peddling false hope.
"Is it because:
I don’t have a medical degree?"
Whoa, that's enough to give me pause right there. Additionally:
"A Phase I/II study (NCT05318469), conducted by researchers at Cedars-Sinai and City of Hope, tested a combination of:
Oral ivermectin (30–60 mg)
Balstilimab, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor developed by Agenus . . . "
What would you expect from institutions heavily funded and controlled by Big Pharma? Of course, they are going to do all they can to discredit alternative methods of treatment that threaten their bottom line.
And you, Xuewu Liu, adding to the "ivermectin-bashing" seriously calls into question YOUR credibility. Tearing down ivermectin in order to promote YOUR chlorine dioxide therapy? Pretty easy to see your incentive to post this. I've read many exchanges you've had with Robert Yoho MD - he's not very fond of you or your work, either.
That’s a strange accusation.
Why shouldn’t I be allowed to question ivermectin? Is my credibility supposed to depend on worshiping a drug with limited clinical effect?
Are you a cancer patient—or the family of one?
Because if you’re not, you probably don’t realize what it’s like to watch someone dying while holding onto false hope.
Defending the ivermectin myth as if it’s untouchable doesn’t help patients. It hurts them. It wastes their time. I’ve seen people delay real treatment and die waiting for it to work.
I’ve also seen tumors collapse in days from direct chlorine dioxide injection. So I speak out because I care about what actually works—not about pleasing you or any doctor who dislikes me.
My job is not to please you—or Dr. Yoho—or to follow the crowd.
My work stands on its own evidence, its own mechanism, and its own clinical cases.
If that offends you, maybe ask yourself:
What do you care more about—ideology or saving lives?
Because I’ve made my choice.
And as for the clinical trial—
Are you saying you don’t like the result, or you simply don’t believe it?
How often was the IV given ?
Hi Mr Liu. Please check your email. I’ve been trying to contact you.
How can I cotact you? What is the address ofyour German Partners? I live in Poland so would look for a reasoable close location.
📧 xuewu.liu@cdsxcancer.com
📱 WhatsApp: +8613522136898