My Intra-Tumoral Chlorine Dioxide Therapy has now accumulated nearly 20 documented cases, including in human and veterinary patients, showing a consistent mechanism of action.
Has anyone heard the Day Tapes? drrichardday.wordpress.com has a section on suppressing cancer cures as a method of population control as well as all the social engineering methods used to steer us to where we are today. The tapes were recorded in late 80's recalling the meeting and points discussed which was March, 1969. Since Convid, my research has unearthed many psyops, including HIV/AIDS, the same MO to put fear into people to control them. I no longer support the big cancer research charities knowing what I know now. Peer review - doesn't it all depend on who's doing it, conflicts of interest and all that?
Yes. Dr. Lawrence Dungan (spelling?) He was only listing what he remembered of the talk!He said it was conducted like the drug companies do their dinners. Full belly, alcohol, low lights, respected speaker, no note taking, not a classroom atmosphere. It sounded like what the hypnotists call 'induction', what the academics call 'prerequisites', and the animal handlers in labs call 'gentling', and social engineers call 'Overtons window'.
Getting the subjects ready for further conditioning, programming the subconscious to accept suggestion, disabling higher centers of the brain. Dungan may have been one of those people not easily hypnotized because he remembered also that his colleagues didn't remember anything as he did when he asked them. They couldn't grasp the significance or compare it to their own observation and so couldn't see it happening.
What is TV, Tic Tok, u tube shorts, endless 'continuing education', cues planted everywhere, Accept, Submit, Apply, Learn More, Yield, Stop, Bells, Clocks, Electronic monitors for body and mind.
That's not to mention the more modern conditioning to ask oracles for answers to any question that either occurs to them or they are programmed to ask. That dead ends exploration or individual thought development. It is microwave brownie, instant pudding, happy meal for your brain. Aldoux Huxley's little quote about conditioning children to believe snow is black comes to mind. Rule by experts or technocracy was what Richard Day was introducing to his former students with his examples. As he told them, "Nothing can stop us now". Re defining terms and stunting thought, increasing suggestibility and emotionality has been going on for a long time. See The Leipzig Connection Paolo Lioni.
I don't have high hopes for AI because of all the above. Rather than a quality check, it seems to be a substitute for experimentation and thinking, possibly the replacement for Peer review.
Who reviews Peer Review? Why do they call it RE search? Don't immediately answer just leave that open and pick a subject and find peer reviewed papers or studies to support a side you like or one you don't like. The phrases 'settled science' or 'evidence based medicine' or 'consensus science' are like that hernia mesh that gets so wrapped up in scar tissue that it can't be removed from the body without disabling or killing the host.
The cancer industry phrase is another hernia mesh. A sizeable part of the economy runs on the industry of producing and processing chronic disease and its resulting revenue streams. You can see some of the enormity of its effects in your town by thinking about the size of the buildings, proportion of employees to support the various institutions, the people in your group with cancers, the cars in the parking lots, the mansions and accoutrements of affluence stemming from 'Health Care'. See Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis.
My like button not working but I like your comment. A lot of stuff disappearing from the internet too, plus asking AI the right questions is key to getting real answers, according to John Rappoport.
Its ok. Sometime in 2017 or so when https came in, tons of info vanished from search results. Now to find it you have to know the exact old address. For example if I search for the website whale, nothing. I have to type http://www.whale.to/b/ to find it.
A right question may be asked but if the answer from ai is deceptive, slanted or fabricated for the question how good is the process? The questioner assumes the answer will be neutral, just as some assume authority has best interests of the public in mind or that science and medicine has no pecuniary interest.
A chatgpt paper I looked up had over a hundred references. I searched for a few of them as an authenticity check. Some did not exist. A legit online journal, but unfindable title, issue and pages. That shook my confidence in ai as a reliable, neutral disinterested tool for inquiry.
Ai might be useful for consolidating, organizing or giving new perspectives, but not for outsourcing thinking. That is the hazard, I see.
Congratulations on your helpful discovery and for being a brave innovator in an area with much stagnation. AI will replace all the smug pharma pushing doctors. Only doctors with courage and bravery will be wanted and needed. God Bless 🙏
Has anyone heard the Day Tapes? drrichardday.wordpress.com has a section on suppressing cancer cures as a method of population control as well as all the social engineering methods used to steer us to where we are today. The tapes were recorded in late 80's recalling the meeting and points discussed which was March, 1969. Since Convid, my research has unearthed many psyops, including HIV/AIDS, the same MO to put fear into people to control them. I no longer support the big cancer research charities knowing what I know now. Peer review - doesn't it all depend on who's doing it, conflicts of interest and all that?
Yes. Dr. Lawrence Dungan (spelling?) He was only listing what he remembered of the talk!He said it was conducted like the drug companies do their dinners. Full belly, alcohol, low lights, respected speaker, no note taking, not a classroom atmosphere. It sounded like what the hypnotists call 'induction', what the academics call 'prerequisites', and the animal handlers in labs call 'gentling', and social engineers call 'Overtons window'.
Getting the subjects ready for further conditioning, programming the subconscious to accept suggestion, disabling higher centers of the brain. Dungan may have been one of those people not easily hypnotized because he remembered also that his colleagues didn't remember anything as he did when he asked them. They couldn't grasp the significance or compare it to their own observation and so couldn't see it happening.
What is TV, Tic Tok, u tube shorts, endless 'continuing education', cues planted everywhere, Accept, Submit, Apply, Learn More, Yield, Stop, Bells, Clocks, Electronic monitors for body and mind.
That's not to mention the more modern conditioning to ask oracles for answers to any question that either occurs to them or they are programmed to ask. That dead ends exploration or individual thought development. It is microwave brownie, instant pudding, happy meal for your brain. Aldoux Huxley's little quote about conditioning children to believe snow is black comes to mind. Rule by experts or technocracy was what Richard Day was introducing to his former students with his examples. As he told them, "Nothing can stop us now". Re defining terms and stunting thought, increasing suggestibility and emotionality has been going on for a long time. See The Leipzig Connection Paolo Lioni.
I don't have high hopes for AI because of all the above. Rather than a quality check, it seems to be a substitute for experimentation and thinking, possibly the replacement for Peer review.
Who reviews Peer Review? Why do they call it RE search? Don't immediately answer just leave that open and pick a subject and find peer reviewed papers or studies to support a side you like or one you don't like. The phrases 'settled science' or 'evidence based medicine' or 'consensus science' are like that hernia mesh that gets so wrapped up in scar tissue that it can't be removed from the body without disabling or killing the host.
The cancer industry phrase is another hernia mesh. A sizeable part of the economy runs on the industry of producing and processing chronic disease and its resulting revenue streams. You can see some of the enormity of its effects in your town by thinking about the size of the buildings, proportion of employees to support the various institutions, the people in your group with cancers, the cars in the parking lots, the mansions and accoutrements of affluence stemming from 'Health Care'. See Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis.
One comment can't hold this can of worms.
My like button not working but I like your comment. A lot of stuff disappearing from the internet too, plus asking AI the right questions is key to getting real answers, according to John Rappoport.
Its ok. Sometime in 2017 or so when https came in, tons of info vanished from search results. Now to find it you have to know the exact old address. For example if I search for the website whale, nothing. I have to type http://www.whale.to/b/ to find it.
A right question may be asked but if the answer from ai is deceptive, slanted or fabricated for the question how good is the process? The questioner assumes the answer will be neutral, just as some assume authority has best interests of the public in mind or that science and medicine has no pecuniary interest.
A chatgpt paper I looked up had over a hundred references. I searched for a few of them as an authenticity check. Some did not exist. A legit online journal, but unfindable title, issue and pages. That shook my confidence in ai as a reliable, neutral disinterested tool for inquiry.
Ai might be useful for consolidating, organizing or giving new perspectives, but not for outsourcing thinking. That is the hazard, I see.
Congratulations on your helpful discovery and for being a brave innovator in an area with much stagnation. AI will replace all the smug pharma pushing doctors. Only doctors with courage and bravery will be wanted and needed. God Bless 🙏
They shut you out if their profits are threatened.
100% agree with your thoughts on this one. Press forward! People will follow the truth.